Reverberations is home today after traveling the world for the past two years with a group exhibit. It’s been to the UK, South Africa and zig-zagged across the US a couple of times. Welcome home, old friend.
While I spend endless hours on the business of art, I also spend a fair amount of time moving the pile of exhibit submission forms back and forth across the desk. This day I separated those for Tall Girl Series from the rest of the pack, and in reality the pile is now much smaller. Which pile?!
After being slammed by a seemingly 24 hour bug, I decided today would be a good day to be lazy. Well, lazy is probably not the right word; more like productive while wearing jammies! In my infinite wisdom I decided to tackle said pile of submissions.
It is not so much a crap-shoot which to enter, as it used to be. As my bio has grown, I now aim for venues where I have not shown before, where the exhibit is at least a month long and where the entry fee is not exorbitant. I keep exceptional records on a long spreadsheet of where every piece has been submitted, accepted/declined, exhibited, dates thereof, etc. I also color code said spreadsheet so I can instantly tell which work is sold, nfs, unavailable or just too old! I doubt painters deal with the age factor like textile artists do. As my own inner critic I know which work I do not choose to exhibit, work that no longer speaks to my style. I don’t need an assigned age to separate out my best work!
So in my short stack was one for artists whose work has been rejected elsewhere. Everyone, including Picasso I imagine has had work rejected from various exhibits. I kind of laughed when I read the prospectus and then thought what the hay!
I grabbed the hardcopy of said spreadsheet and began to peruse the list. I have had a lot of work that was rejected from exhibits over the years; much of which has later gone on to glory, sold or been accepted at some other fabulous venue.
Additionally, this exhibit of rejected work requests a copy of the rejection letter to accompany each entry; or the verbiage of same letter. Actually I don’t collect decline/rejection letters! What is wrong with me?!!! (rhetoric question)
I barely read them. As soon as I get into the we received 10 gazillion stunning entries, my attention has lapsed. Spare me the melodrama please! And yet last year as curator of SAQA’s Points of View, I too had to send the sorry, sucker letter to over 100 artists with stunning entries! It was one of the few tasks as curator that I actually had some input in, so I drafted my own rejection letter which really was a work of art itself. Many e-mailed back it was the kindest rejection letter they had ever received!!!
Back to my entries, which you can see I am procrastinating on again, by writing this blog. What I really learned in perusing my spreadsheet for the potential entries in the rejection exhibit is I have accomplished a lot as an artist in the past five years. I was recently accused of being an art snob by one who clearly does not get it. I have worked really hard to attain this level of success with my work, and I am darn proud of it. The only thing is I don’t have a fistful of rejection letters to prove it. You just have to take my word for it.